Circa 1941: Peter and Mary (Curcio) Laurence, married 40 years

Spread the love

Sepia Saturday 606B. Twenty-fourth in a photo blog series on my maternal Italian ancestors from Gloversville, Fulton Co., N.Y.

Some time in the early 1940s, my maternal Italian great-grandparents Peter and Mary (Curcio) Laurence were photographed as a couple in the back yard of their home at 12 Wells Street in Gloversville, Fulton Co., N.Y.

The photo is not dated, but clearly they were celebrating something special. My great-grandmother Mary (who went by Mamie) is wearing a corsage, a striking hat, and carries a leather clutch and gloves. And Peter — born Pietro di Lorenzo — is in a suit, tie and starched-collared shirt , and he has a boutonniere in his lapel.

Peter and Mary (Curcio) Laurence in their back yard at 12 Wells Street, Gloversville, N.Y. (circa 1941). Scan by Molly Charboneau

What was the occasion?

The photo is undated, leaving me to puzzle over what year it was taken and what the occasion may have been.

Peter and Mamie married in 1901, so they may have been celebrating their 40th wedding anniversary. My grandfather Antonio W. Laurence — their oldest child — was born in May 1902. So they probably had a warm weather wedding the year before, which would fit with this photo being taken in the warmer months.

It’s unlikely they were celebrating Peter’s retirement, since he was self-employed and could stop working when he wanted. And both of their sons had long since been married.

When was the photo taken?

In 1940, according to the federal census1FamilySearch requires free login to view records, Peter, 67, and Mamie, 57, were living in their 12 Wells Street home with their son Joseph, his wife Theresa and their two daughters.

Mamie and Peter look to be about the ages that were given in the 1940 US census and, sadly, Peter died in 1944. So the photo was likely taken in the early 1940s — possibly 1941, if it was their for their anniversary celebration.

Circa 1911: Peter and Mamie (Curcio) Laurence with sons Joseph (left) and my grandfather Antonio (right). Scan by Molly Charboneau

Mellowed by time

Mamie and Peter posed with their sons for an earlier portrait in 1911 — when they had been married ten years. When I last posted this photo, readers commented that my great-grandparents looked serious and care-worn.

In the 1941 photo, however, they seem mellowed by time — while keeping pace with fashion changes. They had lived decades in their Wells Street home, their sons were grown and married, work worries were behind them (with my grandfather Antonio taking over Peter’s garage/junk yard business), and they had the opportunity to enjoy their four grand-daughters — among them my mother Peg (Laurence) Charboneau.

Their expressions project satisfaction at a life well-lived — and I am thrilled to have this late-in-life photo of them.

Up next, Antoinette (Del Negro) Curcio in the early 1940s. Meanwhile, please visit the blogs of this week’s other Sepia Saturday participants.

© 2022 Molly Charboneau. All rights reserved.

8 thoughts on “Circa 1941: Peter and Mary (Curcio) Laurence, married 40 years”

  1. It is a lovely portrait and I like how you’ve considered the occasion when it was taken. For many families in this era a photograph was a memento for a special event when people dressed up and posed in a formal way. It’s rare to see occupational photos when people wore their regular everyday clothes. Comparing the two portraits is clever way to consider their thoughts on this occasion. Even if I didn’t already know them from your series, I would describe the older couple, certainly Peter, as displaying pride and accomplishment in the moment the camera took the photo. It’s neat that his left hand is in the same position in both photos showing his ring, a wedding band I presume, Do you think they sent copies of the photo back to their family in Italy?

    1. I have a feeling they did send these photos back to Italy — which may explain the formal pose and adds to the possibility that this might have been their 40th wedding anniversary photo. I inherited this photo in a frame, so it was probably also displayed in their home — or my grandfather Tony’s after they passed. Definitely a cherished photo!

  2. I love her hair style.

    Wonderful portraits, which you’re fortunate to have. I like that your post has them at different ages.

  3. That is a lovely photograph and certainly one to treasure since Peter died not long after it was taken. They do look as they are enjoying a celebratory day.

    1. Thanks, Kathy. I am pleased to have this late-in-life photo of my great-grandparents — particularly since it may have one of the last of Peter.

  4. I think, in the younger portrait with their boys, Mamie & Peter were simply following the photographer’s suggestion they not smile. Neither boy was smiling either. Later, of course, the same restrictions didn’t apply when photographing people. Either way, they were a handsome family and a handsome couple. 🙂

    1. You are probably right about the “don’t smile” edict by the photographer in the 1911 photo. They certainly all seemed to have followed it — although the boys may just have been unhappy to have to stand still instead of run around playing. Either way, I feel fortunate to have these two photos of my great-grandparents together.

Comments are closed.